You outgrew the platform you started on.
I rebuild your site in Astro, keep the design you paid for, keep the URLs that earn traffic, and hand your team a repository they own.
Why teams leave.
The seat bill outgrew the site.
You are paying per editor, per plugin, or per site for a platform you now use as a static host and little else.
The thing you need next is not on the roadmap.
A real search, a gated area, a pricing calculator that talks to your API. Every workaround is another embed, and every embed is more weight on the page.
Your engineers cannot review a change.
There is no diff, no branch, no pull request. Things go live because somebody clicked publish.
How I run it.
-
Same pixels, different engine
The rebuild matches the site you have — nothing gets redesigned unless you ask for it. What changes is everything underneath.
-
URL parity, checked line by line
Every live URL comes across at the same path, and I diff the two sitemaps before the switch. Anything that genuinely has to move gets a 301.
-
A repository your team recognizes
Astro, plain components, and no framework tax you did not ask for. Pages ship as finished HTML, and JavaScript loads only where a section actually needs it. It builds on Vercel or wherever you host today.
-
Content stays editable
Marketing does not lose the ability to publish. Copy lands in Sanity, a headless CMS your team edits in the browser, and its structure is set up before the first component is written.
What you own afterwards.
A Git repository with the full history, a build that runs on your own hosting, the redirect map, and the speed reports before and after. No part of the site needs me around to keep it running.
Questions about moving to Astro.
Webflow, WordPress, Framer, Wix, Squarespace, and custom builds in React, Next.js or Gatsby. If your site is live, I can rebuild it in Astro: the content comes across through an export, the platform’s API, or the live pages themselves.
No, unless you want it to. The default is a faithful rebuild: same design, same content, same URLs, new foundation underneath.
Astro. It serves finished HTML with almost no JavaScript, which is why the rebuild lands faster than the site it replaces, and it is plain enough that any engineer you hire later can pick it up.
Yes, and it is a requirement rather than an extra. Your content lives in Sanity, a headless CMS your team edits in the browser, and I set it up before I write the first component.
Sanity. It gives your team a clean editor in the browser, real-time collaboration, and content structured around your pages instead of one big rich-text field. The site rebuilds on its own every time someone publishes.
Not if the migration is done properly. I keep your URL structure, set up 301 redirects wherever URLs change, and carry over meta tags, schema, and sitemaps. I also monitor indexing and rankings after launch to catch any issues early. In many cases, performance improves after the move.
I export your CMS content and move it into Sanity. Your posts, images, and metadata come over intact, and your team edits them in an editor structured around your content.
No. I build and test everything on a staging environment, then switch over at the DNS level once everything is verified. That keeps downtime close to zero.
I rebuild and reconnect your forms, analytics, CRM, email tools, and any other integrations, then test each one before launch so no leads or data get lost.
Send me your site URL.
I reply within a day with what the rebuild involves and where the platform is actually costing you.
Plan the move